Talk:Etimri Declensions: Difference between revisions
From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Do the nouns have teh same case system as the pronouns? That is, do they use one case of monotransitive accusative and ditransitive dative, and a second for ditransitive accusative? If s...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Do the nouns have teh same case system as the pronouns? That is, do they use one case of monotransitive accusative and ditransitive dative, and a second for ditransitive accusative? If so, is -out/-ouk/-oud used for the primary object (mon. acc/ditrans. dat.) and -etsh/-ets for teh secondary object (ditrans. acc)? [[User:Nik|Nik]] 00:53, 1 August 2007 (PDT) | Do the nouns have teh same case system as the pronouns? That is, do they use one case of monotransitive accusative and ditransitive dative, and a second for ditransitive accusative? If so, is -out/-ouk/-oud used for the primary object (mon. acc/ditrans. dat.) and -etsh/-ets for teh secondary object (ditrans. acc)? [[User:Nik|Nik]] 00:53, 1 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
Thank you for catching that mistake on my part. Yes, I meant monotransitive accusitive/ditransitive dative when I said accusitive and the other for dative. I'll go fix that now. [[User:Humancadaver101|Humancadaver101]] 03:36, 2 August 2007 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:36, 2 August 2007
Do the nouns have teh same case system as the pronouns? That is, do they use one case of monotransitive accusative and ditransitive dative, and a second for ditransitive accusative? If so, is -out/-ouk/-oud used for the primary object (mon. acc/ditrans. dat.) and -etsh/-ets for teh secondary object (ditrans. acc)? Nik 00:53, 1 August 2007 (PDT)
Thank you for catching that mistake on my part. Yes, I meant monotransitive accusitive/ditransitive dative when I said accusitive and the other for dative. I'll go fix that now. Humancadaver101 03:36, 2 August 2007 (PDT)
