User:Melroch/Vulgar Latin: Difference between revisions
From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Made Latinb vowels smallcaps and added row numbers, added note on the old phonology section) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Anyway my first attempt at ''anything'' tends to get messy! {{-)}} | Anyway my first attempt at ''anything'' tends to get messy! {{-)}} | ||
== Vowels == | |||
{| class="gridtable IPA" style="text-align: center;" border="1" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" | {| class="gridtable IPA" style="text-align: center;" border="1" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" | ||
|+ Stressed vowels | |+ Stressed vowels | ||
! style="text-align: right;" | | ! style="text-align: right;" | 0) | ||
! style="text-align: left;" | Latin | ! style="text-align: left;" | Latin | ||
! style="text-align: center; width: 3em;" |{{SC|ī}} | ! style="text-align: center; width: 3em;" |{{SC|ī}} | ||
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
! style="text-align: center; width: 3em;" |{{SC|ū}} | ! style="text-align: center; width: 3em;" |{{SC|ū}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
! style="text-align: right;" | 1 | ! style="text-align: right;" | 1) | ||
! style="text-align: left;" | Early V.L. | ! style="text-align: left;" | Early V.L. | ||
| i | | i | ||
| Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
| u | | u | ||
|- | |- | ||
! style="text-align: right;" | 2 | ! style="text-align: right;" | 2) | ||
! style="text-align: left;" | Sard/African V.L. | ! style="text-align: left;" | Sard/African V.L. | ||
| colspan="2" | i | | colspan="2" | i | ||
| Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
| colspan="2" | u | | colspan="2" | u | ||
|- | |- | ||
! style="text-align: right;" | 3 | ! style="text-align: right;" | 3) | ||
! style="text-align: left;" | Sicilian V.L. | ! style="text-align: left;" | Sicilian V.L. | ||
| colspan="3" | i | | colspan="3" | i | ||
| Line 46: | Line 47: | ||
| colspan="3" | u | | colspan="3" | u | ||
|- | |- | ||
! style="text-align: right;" | 4 | ! style="text-align: right;" | 4) | ||
! style="text-align: left;" | Corsican V.L. | ! style="text-align: left;" | Corsican V.L. | ||
| i | | i | ||
| Line 58: | Line 59: | ||
| u | | u | ||
|- | |- | ||
! style="text-align: right;" | 5 | ! style="text-align: right;" | 5) | ||
! style="text-align: left;" | Western V.L. | ! style="text-align: left;" | Western V.L. | ||
| i | | i | ||
| Line 68: | Line 69: | ||
| u | | u | ||
|- | |- | ||
! style="text-align: right;" | 6 | ! style="text-align: right;" | 6) | ||
! style="text-align: left;" | Eastern V.L. | ! style="text-align: left;" | Eastern V.L. | ||
| i | | i | ||
| Line 78: | Line 79: | ||
| colspan="2" | u | | colspan="2" | u | ||
|} | |} | ||
* All attested Romance vowel systems presuppose an early Vulgar Latin (1) system where the length distinctions of the Latin (0) | |||
* All of (2, 3, 5, 6) can be derived from (1), although in the case of (2) it is more reasonable to assume that it derives directly from (0) through loss of the length distinction. In the case of (4) it is most likely that it derives from a system parallel to (1) where {{SC|ĭ}} had merged with {{SC|ĕ}} and {{SC|ŭ}} had merged with {{SC|ŏ}} before the loss of the length distinction. | |||
* | |||
Revision as of 11:38, 12 April 2007
I begun a phonology, but it seems my sources were too contradictory, and old, so that they didn't distinguish sufficiently between phonological, morphological and analogical changes, or at least had a different idea about them from modern sources. Anyway my first attempt at anything tends to get messy! ☺
Vowels
| 0) | Latin | ī | ĭ | ē | ĕ | ā | ă | ŏ | ō | ŭ | ū |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1) | Early V.L. | i | ɪ | e | ɛ | a | ɔ | o | ʊ | u | |
| 2) | Sard/African V.L. | i | e | a | o | u | |||||
| 3) | Sicilian V.L. | i | e | a | o | u | |||||
| 4) | Corsican V.L. | i | ɛ | e | ɛ | a | ɔ | o | ɔ | u | |
| 5) | Western V.L. | i | e | ɛ | a | ɔ | o | u | |||
| 6) | Eastern V.L. | i | e | ɛ | a | ɔ | o | u | |||
- All attested Romance vowel systems presuppose an early Vulgar Latin (1) system where the length distinctions of the Latin (0)
- All of (2, 3, 5, 6) can be derived from (1), although in the case of (2) it is more reasonable to assume that it derives directly from (0) through loss of the length distinction. In the case of (4) it is most likely that it derives from a system parallel to (1) where ĭ had merged with ĕ and ŭ had merged with ŏ before the loss of the length distinction.
