Primordial scratchpad: Difference between revisions
Poswob Rare (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Poswob Rare (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
;Apr 25, 2020 | ;Apr 25, 2020 | ||
Note that [[Mumba]] is ultimately cognate to '''Saffaslujje''' and that the city could legitimately just be called Mumba or something like Omumba. | *Note that [[Mumba]] is ultimately cognate to '''Saffaslujje''' and that the city could legitimately just be called Mumba or something like Omumba. | ||
*IF the 2P pronoun in Silatibarra is /hət/, it could have begun with any of /s š ś h/ in Primordial, and possibly also /x/. Likewise the final consonant could have been /č/ instead, which probably functions as /tʲ/. | |||
Revision as of 14:26, 25 April 2020
this is the ancestor of almost ALL Languages of Teppala. Despite its name, it still is not the ancestor of literally all languages, because there are scattered aboriginal groups who settled the mainland ~50000BC and kept their languages as other groups took away their land. But by 4000 AD, even these surviving groups had come to be politically dominated by the descendants of the migrants who spoke languages derived from Primordial.
- Scope
This language was spoken sometime between 14000 BC and 11000 BC. The "pre-primordial" language is only present to give the sound changes needed to make the asymmetrical inventory of Primordial.
SCRATCHPAD
All unorganized ideas go here. Possibly rename this page to a lowercase acronym like with ppot.
- Apr 25, 2020
- Note that Mumba is ultimately cognate to Saffaslujje and that the city could legitimately just be called Mumba or something like Omumba.
- IF the 2P pronoun in Silatibarra is /hət/, it could have begun with any of /s š ś h/ in Primordial, and possibly also /x/. Likewise the final consonant could have been /č/ instead, which probably functions as /tʲ/.
Phonology
The consonant inventory is unclear; it depends on what stage of the language is being reconstructed. The Languages of Teppala page as of Apr 25 2020 lists the vowel inventory as just /a ɜ ɨ/, but it should probably be something like /a ɜ ɨ ā ē ī ō ū/ or at least /a ai au ɜ ɜi ɜu ɨ ī ū/.
Grammar
There were no classifiers.
There were infixes, which survived in both Repilian languages and Tapilula for >10000 years of changes (though evolving into greatly different final forms in the two branches). There may have been prefixes, which disappeared in Tapilula because Tapilula needed the prefix slot for its classifiers. Thus, a whole slew of prefixes could be made for Primordial with absolutely no need to synchronize them with Tapilula.
THe pronouns na "I" and ge "you", whatever their original forms, may well go back all the way to Primordial. In Mumba ~8000 BC their forms would probably have been /na/ and /hə/, though perhaps there were final consonants that disappeared. e.g. the words could have been /nap/ and /hət/. or 1P could be /nakʷ/, if it happens that /akʷ/ > /a/ rather than /akʷ/ > /o/.